WebNov 26, 2012 · United States Supreme Court. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION v.PHOEBE PUTNEY HEALTH SYSTEM, INC., ET AL. (2013) No. 11-1160 Argued: November 26, 2012 Decided: February 19, 2013. Under Georgia's Hospital Authorities Law (Law), political subdivisions may create special-purpose public entities called hospital authorities to … WebNov 26, 2012 · Since its establishment, the Authority acquired hospitals throughout the area and leased the facilities to two non-profit corporations: Phoebe Putney Health System ("PPHS") and Phoebe Putney Memorial Hospital ("PPMH"). In December 2010, PPHS presented to the Authority a plan to buy the only remaining hospital in the area, Palmyra …
Statement of the Commission - In the Matter of Phoebe …
WebFeb 21, 2013 · On February 19, 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held that state-action immunity does not protect a state-created hospital authority from antitrust scrutiny over a proposed hospital merger where the anticompetitive effect of such merger was not a “foreseeable result” authorized by the state. FTC v. Phoebe Putney Health System, Inc., … WebApr 3, 2015 · The agency argued that the $195 million takeover violated federal antitrust laws and greatly reduced healthcare competition in the southwest Georgia. Phoebe Putney, publicly owned by the Hospital Authority of Albany-Dougherty County, went ahead with the acquisition in 2011, renamed Palmyra as Phoebe North and appealed the FTC’s suits. bleach toshiro adult form
FTC v. Phoebe Putney Health System, Inc.: - DLA Piper
WebFeb 20, 2013 · Phoebe Putney Health System, Inc. (11-1160), Florida v. Harris (11-817), Chafin v. Chafin (11-1347) and Order List. February 20, 2013 Supreme Court Update. ... The district court dismissed the FTC’s action, finding the Authority immune from suit under the state action doctrine. The Eleventh Circuit affirmed, reasoning that the Authority was … WebPHOEBE PUTNEY HEALTH SYSTEM, INC. FTC Syllabus . seeable result of the Law. The court reasoned that the state legisla-ture could have readily anticipated an anticompetitive effect, given the breadth of the powers delegated to hospital authorities, particu-larly leasing and acquisition powers that could lead to consolidation of hospital ownership. frank\u0027s whiskey place louisville ky